fix: peak index calculation in MmrProof
This commit is contained in:
parent
3d71a9b59b
commit
61a0764a61
1 changed files with 73 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
|
||||||
use super::super::MerklePath;
|
use super::super::MerklePath;
|
||||||
use super::{full::high_bitmask, leaf_to_corresponding_tree};
|
use super::{full::high_bitmask, leaf_to_corresponding_tree};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// MMR PROOF
|
||||||
|
// ================================================================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
|
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq)]
|
||||||
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", derive(serde::Deserialize, serde::Serialize))]
|
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", derive(serde::Deserialize, serde::Serialize))]
|
||||||
pub struct MmrProof {
|
pub struct MmrProof {
|
||||||
|
@ -26,9 +29,78 @@ impl MmrProof {
|
||||||
self.position - forest_before
|
self.position - forest_before
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Returns index of the MMR peak against which the Merkle path in this proof can be verified.
|
||||||
pub fn peak_index(&self) -> usize {
|
pub fn peak_index(&self) -> usize {
|
||||||
let root = leaf_to_corresponding_tree(self.position, self.forest)
|
let root = leaf_to_corresponding_tree(self.position, self.forest)
|
||||||
.expect("position must be part of the forest");
|
.expect("position must be part of the forest");
|
||||||
(self.forest.count_ones() - root - 1) as usize
|
let smaller_peak_mask = 2_usize.pow(root) as usize - 1;
|
||||||
|
let num_smaller_peaks = (self.forest & smaller_peak_mask).count_ones();
|
||||||
|
(self.forest.count_ones() - num_smaller_peaks - 1) as usize
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// TESTS
|
||||||
|
// ================================================================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||||
|
mod tests {
|
||||||
|
use super::{MerklePath, MmrProof};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#[test]
|
||||||
|
fn test_peak_index() {
|
||||||
|
// --- single peak forest ---------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
let forest = 11;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the first 4 leaves belong to peak 0
|
||||||
|
for position in 0..8 {
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, position);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 0);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// --- forest with non-consecutive peaks ------------------------------
|
||||||
|
let forest = 11;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the first 8 leaves belong to peak 0
|
||||||
|
for position in 0..8 {
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, position);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 0);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the next 2 leaves belong to peak 1
|
||||||
|
for position in 8..10 {
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, position);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 1);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the last leaf is the peak 2
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, 10);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 2);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// --- forest with consecutive peaks ----------------------------------
|
||||||
|
let forest = 7;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the first 4 leaves belong to peak 0
|
||||||
|
for position in 0..4 {
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, position);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 0);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the next 2 leaves belong to peak 1
|
||||||
|
for position in 4..6 {
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, position);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 1);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// the last leaf is the peak 2
|
||||||
|
let proof = make_dummy_proof(forest, 6);
|
||||||
|
assert_eq!(proof.peak_index(), 2);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
fn make_dummy_proof(forest: usize, position: usize) -> MmrProof {
|
||||||
|
MmrProof {
|
||||||
|
forest,
|
||||||
|
position,
|
||||||
|
merkle_path: MerklePath::default(),
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue